Critical Self Reflection

 Here is the critical self reflection for my documentary project. 

This project centered on politicians and political activists, specifically exploring a failed assassination attempt on a political leader Campbell Newman, the head of the National Party. Documentaries often portray politicians as figures of authority and influence, but this one represented them as victims. By using formal settings and speeches, the documentary emphasized their seriousness and respectability, aligning with its goal to present these leaders as good people unjustly targeted by hate.

The technical aspects of the documentary Lighting, camera work, and editing played a crucial role in shaping this portrayal. Wide and establishing shots showed the politicians in formal environments, symbolizing their power and stature. Additionally, elements like formal attire reinforced their importance and the gravity of the situation. In contrast, the would-be assassin was shown negatively, with framing and editing emphasizing their actions. This approach supported the documentary’s narrative, which sought to cast the politicians as people in need of support.

Stereotypes were used to convey broader social messages effectively. The politicians were depicted in a traditional light as authoritative and serious, while the assassin remained shrouded in mystery. These stereotypes helped simplify the narrative, making it easier for audiences to distinguish between "good" and "bad" characters. Hall’s representation theory suggests that media often relies on fixed stereotypes to quickly communicate complex ideas. By employing these familiar depictions, the documentary reinforced dominant ideas about power, authority, and deviance.

Branding also played a key role in the documentary's identity. For example, the thumbnail a striking image of the politician in a formal setting with a mysterious statue in the background highlighted the tension between authority and danger. This imagery intrigued potential viewers, drawing them into the story.

Dyer’s ideas on branding further explain how audiences interpret media. The thumbnail’s abstract design encouraged viewers to explore the complexities of the political narrative. This aligns with Altman’s genre theory, which argues that successful media blends familiar conventions with unique twists. The documentary did this by including traditional crime documentary elements, such as interviews and live footage, while focusing on a lesser-known political figure rather than someone high-profile like John Howard.

Audience engagement was another important factor, as suggested by the uses and gratifications theory. Viewers often seek media that entertains, informs, and sparks social discussions. This documentary met those needs by delivering a gripping story about political violence while prompting viewers to reflect on its broader implications. Suspenseful sound design and thought-provoking interviews with politicians added depth and kept the audience intrigued.

Sound design, in particular, was essential in building tension. For instance, one scene leading up to the assassination attempt featured heartbeat sounds and tense music to heighten suspense. Research shows that sound is a powerful tool for guiding emotions and shaping the narrative. By gradually increasing the intensity of the music during critical moments, the documentary heightened the emotional impact of the story.

Looking back, I see that a stronger grasp of crime documentary conventions could have improved the project. While many genre staples were included, there were areas where better use of sound and editing could have enhanced the narrative. For instance, incorporating more dynamic camera angles or creative soundscapes might have added more depth to the portrayal of the political figures.

Self - Re